Nepal Minister chased, kicked, and humiliated through streets as Gen-Z protests boil Azad News HD

 



Introduction

Nepal, the Himalayan republic often described as a fragile democracy navigating its post-monarchy identity, has once again been thrust into political chaos. In a dramatic sequence of events, Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Paudel was publicly chased and assaulted by furious Gen-Z protesters on the streets of Kathmandu, while Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli was forced to resign after days of escalating youth-led demonstrations turned violent.

The scenes stunned the region: young men and women, armed with smartphones, banners, and raw anger, clashed with police, torched government symbols, and demanded sweeping political reforms. For many observers, this was more than another chapter in Nepal’s long history of unstable governments; it was the eruption of a generational revolt led by young citizens who feel betrayed by decades of corruption, joblessness, and political stagnation.


BACKGROUND : Nepal’s Fragile Democracy

Nepal’s democratic journey has been tumultuous since the monarchy was abolished in 2008 and the country declared itself a federal democratic republic. Since then, frequent government changes, constitutional crises, and weak coalition politics have created a climate of instability.

KP Sharma Oli, leader of the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), has been one of the most dominant figures in this era. Rising to prominence on promises of stability, nationalism, and economic development, Oli became Prime Minister three times, most recently returning to power in a coalition that he claimed would finally end the cycle of instability.

Yet, his government quickly came under criticism for its handling of the economy, its controversial alignment with China, and its inability to generate employment for a rapidly growing youth population. While Oli remained a powerful political operator, his failure to address these core grievances slowly built up resentment, particularly among young Nepalis.


The Gen-Z Factor: A New Kind of Protest Movement

The protests that eventually toppled Oli were not led by traditional opposition parties, nor were they orchestrated by veteran politicians. Instead, they were sparked and organized by Nepal’s younger generation—students, jobseekers, and social media-savvy activists who form what is now widely known as the Gen-Z movement.

This demographic, born after the monarchy’s fall, has grown up in a republic but seen little improvement in their lives. High youth unemployment, a culture of political patronage, and widespread corruption have left them deeply disillusioned. Many depend on foreign employment, sending remittances from the Gulf or Malaysia, while those who remain in Nepal face bleak opportunities.

For Gen-Z, the Oli government symbolized everything wrong with the system: aged leaders clinging to power, enriching themselves while young people struggled. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter became rallying grounds, where short videos of police brutality or clips mocking political leaders went viral, mobilizing thousands into the streets.


The Spark That Lit the Fire

The immediate trigger for the protests was a controversial economic package announced by Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Paudel earlier this year. Framed as a “stability budget,” it included higher taxes on basic goods, cuts to student subsidies, and a vague promise of foreign investment projects. Critics called it tone-deaf in a time of economic hardship.

When Paudel publicly defended the policy, saying that “sacrifices are necessary for national development,” his remarks were clipped and spread online, provoking outrage. Within days, protest slogans such as “No More Sacrifices, We Want Jobs!” and “Oli Must Go!” spread across Kathmandu’s universities.


The Assault on Paudel

The chaos reached its climax when Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Paudel attempted to leave a parliamentary session in Kathmandu amid growing protests outside. As his motorcade was blocked by chanting crowds, Paudel reportedly stepped out, hoping to calm the situation. Instead, he was surrounded by furious young demonstrators who accused him of “stealing their future.”

Eyewitnesses described the moment as unprecedented: ministers in Nepal are often shielded by heavy police protection, but this time the barriers collapsed. Videos circulated online showed protesters chasing Paudel down a narrow street, throwing plastic bottles and waving banners. Although police quickly intervened, Paudel was physically shoved and assaulted before being whisked away to safety.

The footage, shared millions of times online, became the defining image of the protests: a senior minister running from his own citizens.


Oli’s Downfall


While Paudel’s assault shocked the political establishment, the decisive blow came when Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli faced mounting pressure within his own party. Coalition partners and opposition members began openly questioning his ability to control the streets.

Inside Parliament, heated debates saw younger lawmakers demand his resignation. Outside, protesters surrounded key government buildings, chanting: “Oli, Resign Now!”. When security forces attempted to disperse crowds with tear gas and batons, clashes only grew fiercer, with several injuries reported.

After days of paralysis, Oli announced his resignation in a televised address. Looking stern but visibly exhausted, he stated:

“I cannot allow the country to descend into violence. Though I believe my government has been unfairly targeted, I step aside for the sake of peace and stability.”


Political Chaos in Kathmandu

Oli’s resignation has left a vacuum. With no clear successor, Nepal is once again plunged into political uncertainty. Coalition negotiations are underway, but with protesters rejecting most of the traditional parties, forming a government that enjoys legitimacy will be difficult.

Meanwhile, the streets of Kathmandu remain tense. Protest camps have sprung up in public squares, with young leaders declaring that they will not leave until sweeping reforms are enacted, including:

  • The resignation of other senior ministers linked to corruption.

  • The introduction of policies specifically targeting youth employment.

  • Reforms to reduce the influence of party elites in candidate selection.


Regional and International Reactions

Nepal’s crisis has drawn close attention from its neighbors, India and China, both of whom have historically vied for influence in Kathmandu.

  • India expressed “concern” and urged peaceful dialogue, wary of instability spilling over into border regions.

  • China, which had cultivated close ties with Oli, issued a cautious statement but privately expressed disappointment over his resignation.

  • The United Nations called for restraint and emphasized the right to peaceful protest.

International analysts suggest that Nepal’s Gen-Z movement could inspire similar youth-led unrest in other South Asian countries facing unemployment and political stagnation.


The Symbolism of the Gen-Z Revolt

More than just a political crisis, the protests have come to symbolize a generational shift in Nepalese society. For decades, politics has been dominated by men in their 60s and 70s, many of whom were former Maoist fighters or veterans of anti-monarchy movements. Gen-Z is openly rejecting this legacy, insisting that their generation deserves a chance to lead.

The use of social media, memes, and viral videos has also marked a new form of protest culture. Unlike older movements reliant on party structures, this uprising was decentralized, digital-first, and youth-driven.


What Next for Nepal?

The future remains uncertain. Some scenarios include:

  1. Caretaker Government: A neutral figure may be appointed to oversee elections within six months.

  2. Coalition Patchwork: Traditional parties may cobble together a fragile government, though it risks being rejected by the protesters.

  3. Youth Representation: Under pressure, mainstream parties might elevate younger leaders into prominent roles, hoping to appease the streets.

  4. Escalation: If demands are ignored, protests could intensify, leading to prolonged instability.


Lessons and Warnings


Nepal’s turmoil offers key lessons:

  • Ignoring Youth is Dangerous: With over 40% of Nepal’s population under 30, sidelining their concerns has proven politically disastrous.

  • Corruption Has a Cost: Years of impunity have eroded public trust, making sudden explosions of anger inevitable.

  • Digital Activism is Powerful: Smartphones and social media have fundamentally changed how movements mobilize.


Conclusion

The assault on Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Paudel and the resignation of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli mark a watershed moment in Nepal’s modern political history. For the first time, an unstructured, youth-driven movement has toppled the government, signaling the arrival of Gen-Z as a decisive political force.

Whether this leads to meaningful reform or plunges the nation deeper into instability will depend on how Nepal’s leaders—and its young protesters—navigate the uncertain road ahead.

What is clear, however, is that the streets of Kathmandu have spoken: Nepal’s next chapter will be written not by aging elites, but by a generation that refuses to accept a stolen future.